Dialogical Apologetics: A Person-Centered Approach to Christian Defense by David K. Clark is a unique and helpful book dealing with the. A good friend recommended David K. Clark’s book, Dialogical Apologetics: A Person-Centered Approach to Christian Defense, Grand Rapids. Dialogical Apologetics weds classical apologetics with person-centered evangelism theory. Logic and philosophy help answer questions of honest inquiry, but.

Author: Kazicage Dijinn
Country: Puerto Rico
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 24 September 2008
Pages: 209
PDF File Size: 6.89 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.42 Mb
ISBN: 315-9-96942-355-8
Downloads: 22247
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tygokora

Lists with This Book. Add or remove collections. In part, it is an attempt to fill the areas apologetids are lacking in the practical use of apologetic arguments.

View as list View as tag cloud report abuse. For those who dialogicl new to apologetics, I would start with Cold-Case Christianity for basics of epistemology and an introduction to the arguments so you know how to respond to people in a person-centered way. Want to Read saving….

In addition to philosophy of religion, he teaches theology and apologetics. In sum, Dixlogical Apologeticsis an important book that goes beyond method and focuses on practice.

Dialogical Apologetics by Clark, David K

But they display a serious apklogetics to sharpen and broaden their understandings. Dialogue is often seen as antithetical to proclamation and defense of Christianity.

It has been around a while but I was not aware of it. Northwestern – Theater Collection. Bethel – Beyond Bethel. Significant developments in philosophy are reaffirming the rational viability of Christian thinking chap.


His approach to these topics emphasizes dialogue: The book is divided into two parts: He will seek to grow in grace, to develop godly character that consistently expresses itself in the details of life. Steven added it Feb 02, The goal of dialogical apologetics is:. Some are like cookbooks that give recipes for every question you might encounter in defending Christian faith.

A week from now we will begin to look at the relationship between science and theology. They do not reflect the views of any present or past employers, funding agencies, colleagues, organisations, family members, churches, insurance companies, or lawyers I currently have or in the past have had some affiliation with.

The last chapter puts it all together, encouraging the reader to listen and empathize with their dialogue partner Bethel – Archive Inventories.

Dialogical Apologetics: A Person Centered Approach To Christian Defense

He has served in senior leadership in a church and at Bethel University. Bethel – Clarion Student Newspaper. Overall, this is a good book. Notify me of new posts via email. Bethel – Hymnal Collection. Hamline – Athletics History. Science does not preclude theology chap.

Review of Dialogical Apologetics

Home About Contact Us. Questions regarding this collection may be directed to the Bethel University Digital Library at or digital-library bethel.

Charles Evans added it Feb 19, Of course, I hope the other is convinced of Christian truth. Hamline – Art Images testing. Manz Manuscript Music Notebooks. Clark shows how Christian apologetics can be integrated into personal dialogue.


By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. An apologist should make asking questions acceptable, not taboo. Introductory lectures on science and theology Student essays on science and theology Awe and wonder talk Weekend in Stockholm Why should we love learning?

Catherine – Alberta Huber Papers.

It is person-centered because it stresses the critical personal dynamic of these encounters. Hamline – Faculty Handbooks. Clark is a unique and helpful book dealing with the practical application of apologetics.

Other religions do not dialogica out a Christian defense, for genuine dialogue with other persons is possible and rewarding chap. This includes developing a proper set of attitudes, listening carefully, being emotionally sensitive, using evidence, being patient, and inviting a response. If you have not read anything on apologetics lately, I highly recommend it. Bethel – Historical Photographs Collection.

I must also assume that any question the other asks is a request for information, not an implicit criticism. Here are the slides. I apolobetics no money from this blog. Jeff Wright added it Dec 06, Hamline – University Buildings.

He now serves the wider church through consulting and public speaking. Thomas – University Archives Photograph Collection.